or Cancel
Shared by Brad on Jun 17, 2009
Things for iPhone had a 3.0 compatibility update waiting on me tonite. Guess productivity ain't for kids.
Teevio, Jun 17, 2009:
What exactly would be considered objectionable for children under 17?
Brad, Jun 17, 2009:
Asparagus.
Nate Dunn, Jun 17, 2009:
*Like*
As do I, just not in my wasted teenage years.
Chris, Jun 18, 2009:
news from the appstore: "getting things done can be objectionable to children..." haha, i've had this message as well.
EpicDewd, Aug 5, 2009:
wow.
Seriously does apple have to do that with an app like Things??
I've also had the message before...
The Engineer, Aug 9, 2009:
Better safe than sorry. Kids today seem to want to get into everything.
go web, Aug 13, 2009:
some of the messages are pointless especially since most children under 17 don't have there own account they just feed of there parents
cooldept., Oct 12, 2009:
I think it's cuz kids are too young to have the need of a to-do list
You need to join this group before you can post comments.
app 2
cultured code 0
iphone 16
os 3.0 0
things 2
Flag this group!
Teevio, Jun 17, 2009:
What exactly would be considered objectionable for children under 17?
Brad, Jun 17, 2009:
Asparagus.
Nate Dunn, Jun 17, 2009:
*Like*
Brad, Jun 17, 2009:
As do I, just not in my wasted teenage years.
Chris, Jun 18, 2009:
news from the appstore: "getting things done can be objectionable to children..."
haha, i've had this message as well.
EpicDewd, Aug 5, 2009:
wow.
Seriously does apple have to do that with an app like Things??
I've also had the message before...
The Engineer, Aug 9, 2009:
Better safe than sorry. Kids today seem to want to get into everything.
go web, Aug 13, 2009:
some of the messages are pointless especially since most children under 17 don't have there own account they just feed of there parents
cooldept., Oct 12, 2009:
I think it's cuz kids are too young to have the need of a to-do list